<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Undead Knights (PSP)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/</link>
	<description>Home of the PS Nation Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>inb4 tl;dr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>inb4 tl;dr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>Nice canned response, I can tell you have to settle these disputes often. Did someone send you a link, or did you just stumble here? That&#039;s a rhetorical question, don&#039;t answer it. Hopefully this will make sense for you. I was trembling with laughter at the whole macho defensive stance your post took. What with the whole &quot;you seem to misunderstand&quot; nonsense and &quot;drop the attitude bits. Classic.

Yeah, they&#039;re free to do write what they want. I&#039;m free to not like it! Tough break, man. Maybe one day these idiots will actually grasp that sort of concept! I don&#039;t care whether you value my opinion or not, I&#039;m just trying to convey that it&#039;s an opinion. I&#039;m not trying to force facts down anyone&#039;s throat. (btw, you bring up a good point with the guidelines bit. That must explain why gaming journalism is in such a sad state)

If they want to have tons of bloated reviews all over their page, that&#039;s up to them. They&#039;ve lost a reader, in that case. It&#039;s not like it&#039;s poorly written, there&#039;s no question the author is skilled with words.

As far as moving on goes, you&#039;re right. You&#039;re absolutely right. How dare anyone ever listen any of their readers. Any time I don&#039;t like something, I should just cancel it. I should just give up and move on. I should be another passive sheep, that&#039;s what you all want.

The author is known to troll people and post a lot of negative things. I find it surprising that I&#039;m getting all this heat from simply posting tl;dr. It seems to me like this is yet another case of &quot;internet tough guy&quot; syndrome. Can dish it, but can&#039;t take it. 

I&#039;d love to be proven wrong, though. You know, show some humility for once. But no, you&#039;re too busy playing party to a simple tl;dr then you should probably man up. Is today the first day you&#039;ve logged in to this &quot;internet&quot; or was the last time you used it back in 2005? I seriously can&#039;t remember the last time so many people got butthurt over something like this. 

I also don&#039;t understand the misconception that I didn&#039;t actually read the article. Oh wait, it&#039;s cause I posted tl;dr. It&#039;s a jibe, man. Don&#039;t take it too literally. Unless, like, you take everything literally. You should probably get that checked out. But it&#039;s still true, IMO. Too long! Great article, but this is 2010. Get with the times.

One other thing, if my opinion is &#039;moot&#039; then don&#039;t tease me with three paragraphs as if you care. If you&#039;re not going to listen to me or my opinion. Don&#039;t respond to me. Take your own advice, otherwise it just makes both of us look silly! Like a tango of trolls or some-such. 

I&#039;m still bemused by the whole thing that even though I tried to respectfully elaborate my opinion, people still can&#039;t seem to settle down. Guess it&#039;s not kosher to use commonly accepted internet jargon here, and that when you DO elaborate it&#039;s just treated like trash. 

Whatever though, I&#039;m done. I think I&#039;ve said all I can say. If you guys want to be adults and actually take some criticism, then that&#039;s cool. If you still think this is some trollfest &#039;98, then you&#039;re just going to be talking to a wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice canned response, I can tell you have to settle these disputes often. Did someone send you a link, or did you just stumble here? That&#8217;s a rhetorical question, don&#8217;t answer it. Hopefully this will make sense for you. I was trembling with laughter at the whole macho defensive stance your post took. What with the whole &#8220;you seem to misunderstand&#8221; nonsense and &#8220;drop the attitude bits. Classic.</p>
<p>Yeah, they&#8217;re free to do write what they want. I&#8217;m free to not like it! Tough break, man. Maybe one day these idiots will actually grasp that sort of concept! I don&#8217;t care whether you value my opinion or not, I&#8217;m just trying to convey that it&#8217;s an opinion. I&#8217;m not trying to force facts down anyone&#8217;s throat. (btw, you bring up a good point with the guidelines bit. That must explain why gaming journalism is in such a sad state)</p>
<p>If they want to have tons of bloated reviews all over their page, that&#8217;s up to them. They&#8217;ve lost a reader, in that case. It&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s poorly written, there&#8217;s no question the author is skilled with words.</p>
<p>As far as moving on goes, you&#8217;re right. You&#8217;re absolutely right. How dare anyone ever listen any of their readers. Any time I don&#8217;t like something, I should just cancel it. I should just give up and move on. I should be another passive sheep, that&#8217;s what you all want.</p>
<p>The author is known to troll people and post a lot of negative things. I find it surprising that I&#8217;m getting all this heat from simply posting tl;dr. It seems to me like this is yet another case of &#8220;internet tough guy&#8221; syndrome. Can dish it, but can&#8217;t take it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to be proven wrong, though. You know, show some humility for once. But no, you&#8217;re too busy playing party to a simple tl;dr then you should probably man up. Is today the first day you&#8217;ve logged in to this &#8220;internet&#8221; or was the last time you used it back in 2005? I seriously can&#8217;t remember the last time so many people got butthurt over something like this. </p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t understand the misconception that I didn&#8217;t actually read the article. Oh wait, it&#8217;s cause I posted tl;dr. It&#8217;s a jibe, man. Don&#8217;t take it too literally. Unless, like, you take everything literally. You should probably get that checked out. But it&#8217;s still true, IMO. Too long! Great article, but this is 2010. Get with the times.</p>
<p>One other thing, if my opinion is &#8216;moot&#8217; then don&#8217;t tease me with three paragraphs as if you care. If you&#8217;re not going to listen to me or my opinion. Don&#8217;t respond to me. Take your own advice, otherwise it just makes both of us look silly! Like a tango of trolls or some-such. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still bemused by the whole thing that even though I tried to respectfully elaborate my opinion, people still can&#8217;t seem to settle down. Guess it&#8217;s not kosher to use commonly accepted internet jargon here, and that when you DO elaborate it&#8217;s just treated like trash. </p>
<p>Whatever though, I&#8217;m done. I think I&#8217;ve said all I can say. If you guys want to be adults and actually take some criticism, then that&#8217;s cool. If you still think this is some trollfest &#8217;98, then you&#8217;re just going to be talking to a wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-646</guid>
		<description>inb4 tl;dr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>inb4 tl;dr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-645</guid>
		<description>Nice canned response, I can tell you have to settle these disputes often. Did someone send you a link, or did you just stumble here? That&#039;s a rhetorical question, don&#039;t answer it. Hopefully this will make sense for you. I was trembling with laughter at the whole macho defensive stance your post took. What with the whole &quot;you seem to misunderstand&quot; nonsense and &quot;drop the attitude bits. Classic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, they&#039;re free to do write what they want. I&#039;m free to not like it! Tough break, man. Maybe one day these idiots will actually grasp that sort of concept! I don&#039;t care whether you value my opinion or not, I&#039;m just trying to convey that it&#039;s an opinion. I&#039;m not trying to force facts down anyone&#039;s throat. (btw, you bring up a good point with the guidelines bit. That must explain why gaming journalism is in such a sad state)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If they want to have tons of bloated reviews all over their page, that&#039;s up to them. They&#039;ve lost a reader, in that case. It&#039;s not like it&#039;s poorly written, there&#039;s no question the author is skilled with words.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as moving on goes, you&#039;re right. You&#039;re absolutely right. How dare anyone ever listen any of their readers. Any time I don&#039;t like something, I should just cancel it. I should just give up and move on. I should be another passive sheep, that&#039;s what you all want.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The author is known to troll people and post a lot of negative things. I find it surprising that I&#039;m getting all this heat from simply posting tl;dr. It seems to me like this is yet another case of &quot;internet tough guy&quot; syndrome. Can dish it, but can&#039;t take it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d love to be proven wrong, though. You know, show some humility for once. But no, you&#039;re too busy playing party to a simple tl;dr then you should probably man up. Is today the first day you&#039;ve logged in to this &quot;internet&quot; or was the last time you used it back in 2005? I seriously can&#039;t remember the last time so many people got butthurt over something like this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also don&#039;t understand the misconception that I didn&#039;t actually read the article. Oh wait, it&#039;s cause I posted tl;dr. It&#039;s a jibe, man. Don&#039;t take it too literally. Unless, like, you take everything literally. You should probably get that checked out. But it&#039;s still true, IMO. Too long! Great article, but this is 2010. Get with the times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One other thing, if my opinion is &#039;moot&#039; then don&#039;t tease me with three paragraphs as if you care. If you&#039;re not going to listen to me or my opinion. Don&#039;t respond to me. Take your own advice, otherwise it just makes both of us look silly! Like a tango of trolls or some-such. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m still bemused by the whole thing that even though I tried to respectfully elaborate my opinion, people still can&#039;t seem to settle down. Guess it&#039;s not kosher to use commonly accepted internet jargon here, and that when you DO elaborate it&#039;s just treated like trash. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever though, I&#039;m done. I think I&#039;ve said all I can say. If you guys want to be adults and actually take some criticism, then that&#039;s cool. If you still think this is some trollfest &#039;98, then you&#039;re just going to be talking to a wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice canned response, I can tell you have to settle these disputes often. Did someone send you a link, or did you just stumble here? That&#39;s a rhetorical question, don&#39;t answer it. Hopefully this will make sense for you. I was trembling with laughter at the whole macho defensive stance your post took. What with the whole &#8220;you seem to misunderstand&#8221; nonsense and &#8220;drop the attitude bits. Classic.</p>
<p>Yeah, they&#39;re free to do write what they want. I&#39;m free to not like it! Tough break, man. Maybe one day these idiots will actually grasp that sort of concept! I don&#39;t care whether you value my opinion or not, I&#39;m just trying to convey that it&#39;s an opinion. I&#39;m not trying to force facts down anyone&#39;s throat. (btw, you bring up a good point with the guidelines bit. That must explain why gaming journalism is in such a sad state)</p>
<p>If they want to have tons of bloated reviews all over their page, that&#39;s up to them. They&#39;ve lost a reader, in that case. It&#39;s not like it&#39;s poorly written, there&#39;s no question the author is skilled with words.</p>
<p>As far as moving on goes, you&#39;re right. You&#39;re absolutely right. How dare anyone ever listen any of their readers. Any time I don&#39;t like something, I should just cancel it. I should just give up and move on. I should be another passive sheep, that&#39;s what you all want.</p>
<p>The author is known to troll people and post a lot of negative things. I find it surprising that I&#39;m getting all this heat from simply posting tl;dr. It seems to me like this is yet another case of &#8220;internet tough guy&#8221; syndrome. Can dish it, but can&#39;t take it. </p>
<p>I&#39;d love to be proven wrong, though. You know, show some humility for once. But no, you&#39;re too busy playing party to a simple tl;dr then you should probably man up. Is today the first day you&#39;ve logged in to this &#8220;internet&#8221; or was the last time you used it back in 2005? I seriously can&#39;t remember the last time so many people got butthurt over something like this. </p>
<p>I also don&#39;t understand the misconception that I didn&#39;t actually read the article. Oh wait, it&#39;s cause I posted tl;dr. It&#39;s a jibe, man. Don&#39;t take it too literally. Unless, like, you take everything literally. You should probably get that checked out. But it&#39;s still true, IMO. Too long! Great article, but this is 2010. Get with the times.</p>
<p>One other thing, if my opinion is &#39;moot&#39; then don&#39;t tease me with three paragraphs as if you care. If you&#39;re not going to listen to me or my opinion. Don&#39;t respond to me. Take your own advice, otherwise it just makes both of us look silly! Like a tango of trolls or some-such. </p>
<p>I&#39;m still bemused by the whole thing that even though I tried to respectfully elaborate my opinion, people still can&#39;t seem to settle down. Guess it&#39;s not kosher to use commonly accepted internet jargon here, and that when you DO elaborate it&#39;s just treated like trash. </p>
<p>Whatever though, I&#39;m done. I think I&#39;ve said all I can say. If you guys want to be adults and actually take some criticism, then that&#39;s cool. If you still think this is some trollfest &#39;98, then you&#39;re just going to be talking to a wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-641</guid>
		<description>You seem to misunderstand the concept of a &lt;b&gt;blog&lt;/b&gt;. There are no globally acknowledged guidelines that need to be followed for video-game reviews. Certainly no character limit. Whether it&#039;s two or two-thousand lines, the author is free to elaborate as much as they want. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the time you spent criticizing the length of the review could of been put to better use, i.e, actually reading the post. It&#039;s sad that you&#039;d go through all the trouble of arguing about not reading the review. It&#039;s too long for you, drop the attitude, find something more constructive to do with your time and move along. You rendered your opinion moot the moment you posted &quot;tl;dr&quot;. There&#039;s a difference between constructive criticism and pointing out that you didn&#039;t bother.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Author has done a great job writing this piece. I can write down a few bullets as to why it&#039;s such a great review, but I would rather spare you another long read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to misunderstand the concept of a <b>blog</b>. There are no globally acknowledged guidelines that need to be followed for video-game reviews. Certainly no character limit. Whether it&#39;s two or two-thousand lines, the author is free to elaborate as much as they want. </p>
<p>All the time you spent criticizing the length of the review could of been put to better use, i.e, actually reading the post. It&#39;s sad that you&#39;d go through all the trouble of arguing about not reading the review. It&#39;s too long for you, drop the attitude, find something more constructive to do with your time and move along. You rendered your opinion moot the moment you posted &#8220;tl;dr&#8221;. There&#39;s a difference between constructive criticism and pointing out that you didn&#39;t bother.</p>
<p>The Author has done a great job writing this piece. I can write down a few bullets as to why it&#39;s such a great review, but I would rather spare you another long read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-640</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t flatter yourself, I have the attention span to read the review. I&#039;m just saying that usually reviews on most blogs aren&#039;t this ridiculously long. Is it really that hard for anyone associated with PSnation to ever take criticism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t flatter yourself, I have the attention span to read the review. I&#39;m just saying that usually reviews on most blogs aren&#39;t this ridiculously long. Is it really that hard for anyone associated with PSnation to ever take criticism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Guile</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Guile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-635</guid>
		<description>You are the moron clicking the link to a text review. Don&#039;t have the attention span to *read text* then just keep listening to the podcast, chuckles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are the moron clicking the link to a text review. Don&#39;t have the attention span to *read text* then just keep listening to the podcast, chuckles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-633</guid>
		<description>I suppose you&#039;re right. However, I&#039;d rather simply get the point across with tl;dr instead of type a wall of text, like I&#039;m accusing this article of doing. You know, avoiding that whole pot/kettle thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose you&#39;re right. However, I&#39;d rather simply get the point across with tl;dr instead of type a wall of text, like I&#39;m accusing this article of doing. You know, avoiding that whole pot/kettle thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark_PSNation</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark_PSNation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-632</guid>
		<description>Well aware what it means, it&#039;s just something I&#039;d think is more fitting for a snide forum post, not commenting on someone&#039;s review. At least you didn&#039;t try for a &quot;First!&quot; so I suppose that&#039;s something. :-p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well aware what it means, it&#39;s just something I&#39;d think is more fitting for a snide forum post, not commenting on someone&#39;s review. At least you didn&#39;t try for a &#8220;First!&#8221; so I suppose that&#39;s something. :-p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.psnation.org/2010/01/13/review-undead-knights-psp-psnation-org/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnation.org/?p=1850#comment-629</guid>
		<description>LMAO! I guess you don&#039;t know what tl;dr even means then. Seriously, this is 2010. Learn to take a tl;dr like a man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO! I guess you don&#39;t know what tl;dr even means then. Seriously, this is 2010. Learn to take a tl;dr like a man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
